Notes on Interpretation of Rule 103: This rule always applies, unless we know the individual(s) responsible and agree with their cause.
___________________________________________________________
Seriously though, Bob's comments about the 'No to the superstore' poster on his street imply that the argument really concerns the permanence and/or the content of the bill - rather than the fact it is there at all. This, in turn, suggests that Surrealist has hit the nail on the head.
All rather unfortunate, since I'd quite like a new superstore (admittedly just because the High Street does not currently have a single redeeming feature and a major new attraction may just change that) and, although I have always opposed the invasion of Iraq, I've had a major problem with lefties since they hijacked a student demo I was involved in around 20 years ago (they let us organise it, stood in the background, then jumped out with their posters when Thatcher's car drove past and the cameras started rolling).
If I put a 'Yes to the superstore' poster up but promise to tear it down when planning permission is refused (due to the hysterical and ill-informed campaign being waged by Nimbies throughout Portobello), will that be allowed to remain?
Statistics: Posted by Guest — 21 Mar 2004, 00:35
]]>
]]>
]]>
Liberate yourself, sister !!
Statistics: Posted by Guest — 19 Mar 2004, 19:06
]]>
Statistics: Posted by bellybabe — 19 Mar 2004, 13:56
]]>
Whilst I am old enough to remember seeing Star Wars when it first came out, I am afraid I did not exist, at least in this incarnation, during the sixties.
However, I am aware of, and can make references to, decades during which I was not a participant.
In this instance, my awareness of said "jingle" comes from the vinyl record produced to commemorate the final broadcast of Radio Caroline.
Statistics: Posted by Guest — 18 Mar 2004, 23:58
]]>
]]>
howsabout 60s jingles? anyone remember "the smoothest way to start your day is with a palmolive shave"?
so, i offer -
"The smoothest way to start your day is with a Blue Bean latte"
Statistics: Posted by Guest — 17 Mar 2004, 00:02
]]>
I know I'm not as good as the Bard
But I get loadsa money off
With my Council Card!
Statistics: Posted by Epykat — 16 Mar 2004, 22:52
]]>
Carlo's fish and chips,
a harvest of potatoes -
but not without cost.
Statistics: Posted by Guest — 15 Mar 2004, 19:41
]]>
Carol, I don't think anyone is talking of removing topics. The 'Favourite Takeaway' thread, as the stats show, is one of our most popular and I think we need some lighter topics to balance the more serious stuff. Do you really think we could negotiate special rates for forum users in exchange for a mention? OK, here goes:
The 108 is the one we rate
The food is great
How about a discount mate?
Yep, that should do it - cut price singapore noodles all round! Or perhaps not.
Statistics: Posted by Guest — 15 Mar 2004, 18:24
]]>
]]>
I often wonder if the posters get larger portions next time they go in because they have flattered (and advertised) the establishment "on the computer". None of them ever say exactly how much their food cost either and when did sharing the same eating venue as Susan Deacon and Lawrence Marshall become something to broadcast to the community?
It has become a name-dropping, ....-licking topic and should be removed from the board long before any important political subject.
Takeaway the building at the Foot of Bath Street - is more like it.
p.s. That Surrealist really gets me going
Statistics: Posted by Carol — 15 Mar 2004, 00:15
]]>
]]>
]]>