They revived it following the planning refusal and sought to designate it for an open space proposal in the draft of the new local plan. But they'd already established, in principle, that housing could be an acceptable use for the site. So any purchase of the site would have to be at the market rate for residential not open space land. That makes it considerably more expensive.
That's why the Council's backing out once again.Statistics: Posted by seanie — 10 May 2008, 14:24
]]>