To compensate for any representational bias every CC is required to actively seek out the opinions and mood of the community and, more importantly, reflect these opinions rather than the opinions of the councillors themselves. This is where PCC has let the community down - there is nothing broken in the CC system as such, we simply have some councillors (enough to make a difference) openly pushing their own agendas in clear contradiction to the consensus within the community.
Where the personal agendas of these councillors and the wishes of the community align, everything is rosy. This was the case in the Virridor and Superstore issues. However, other issues such as the house in Bellfield Lane and the High Street Cafes clearly show personal agendas being pushed. This is simply not acceptable.
Apparently there's some minor local issue over a new school. There is clear and overwhelming support in the local community for this new school to be built as planned but the CC has so far remained 'neutral'. This is a litmus test for the current PCC. Historical neutrality aside, if the CC does not now come out in support of the new school then those councillors opposing it need to be held to account as they are clearly not acting within CEC's guidelines.Statistics: Posted by urchaidh — 26 Apr 2012, 12:27
]]>