Gaddafi meets Blair - "shaking hands with terror"

[Surrealist]

Obviously trying to distance himself from previous links with terror, Tony Blair today met Muammar Gaddafi in his desert home today. Asked if he felt comfortable shaking hands with such an international pariah, Gaddafi said "Mr Blair has obviously realised that his unfortunate past is something he wants to put behind him, and his pledge to get rid of the UK stock of WMDs is an important break with the past."

Some fear, however, that the UK regime's links with organised terror will not be easy for some people to forget.

The UK has long been a sponsor of paramilitary and terror organisations and is notorious amongst other more progressive european nations for
its association with the so-called "NATO" organisation, which spread fear for decades and conducted operations throughout the world.

"This meeting should send a message to the rest of the so-called West that their crimes can be forgotten, and a new military relationship forged to combat real threats like Zionism and US Imperialism" said the Libyan foreign minister.

"We hope that this rapprochement will benefit the UK economy - they will now have more money to combat the awful poverty and social deprivation we hear so much about" said Libya's Prime Minister, Shukri Ghanem. "As well as the weapons inspectors we will be sending to places like Faslane and Porton Down, we will be shipping medicine, olives and dates to the British people".

"We realise that they are just like us, really. We shouldn't blame them for the crimes of their leaders."

[bellybabe]

Dilemma

What would you do?

This test only has one question, but it's a very important one.
Please don't answer it without giving it some serious thought. By
giving an honest answer you will discover where you stand morally.
The test features an unlikely, completely fictional situation in
which you will have to make a decision.

Remember that your answer needs to be honest, yet spontaneous.

Please scroll down slowly and consider each line. Thoughtfulness
is important for this evaluation to be meaningful!

Ready?

Begin.


You're in Florida. In Miami, to be exact... There is chaos around you, caused by a hurricane and severe floods. This is a flood of biblical proportions. You are a photojournalist working for a major newspaper caught in the middle of this great disaster.

The situation is nearly hopeless.


You're trying to shoot career-making photos. There are houses and people swirling around you, some disappearing under the water. You are witnessing Nature all its destructive fury.


You see 2 men in the water; they are fighting for life, trying not to be swept away amidst the roiling water and debris.

You try to get closer. Somehow the men look familiar.


Suddenly, you realize who it is...




It's George W. Bush & T. Blair!



At the same time you realize that the raging waters are about to take them under, forever.

You have two options. You can put down your camera and try to rescue
them or you can take the most dramatic photos of your career documenting the deaths of the world's most powerful men.



Now, here's the question (and please... give an honest answer):



















Would you select colour film, or go with the classic simplicity of
black and white?

[Guest]