by mr magnolia » 26 Apr 2005, 13:23
So is this where we are going to enter into fierce debate about, er, well, something, anyway?
For what it's worth, I think Mr Blair has done a sound political job of leaving an awful lot of people wondering why, on a purely short-term selfish basis, they should vote for anyone else. That's how elections are won.
Sadly, the real moral issues don't really hack it at vote time. How many people will carry their once blazing anger over recent(ish) events in far-away lands into the ballot booth? And once there, how on earth will they decide who to vote for in a first-past-the-post system?
And how will an elected body of anyone at all ever begin to really tackle the issue that may yet make me bitterly regret having chosen to bring magnoliettes into the world?
(and by the way, for some years now I've been expecting peak oil to be 2004 (I can't remember why, but we'll know if that's right in another year or two...)
I don't want to rant too much but on the same theme, why on earth is a city like Edinburgh moving ever closer to reliance upon almost the most unsustainable activity ever invented - airborne global tourism?