Exactly forty years ago I designed a little sign for a record shop which used to be in South College Street called Headquarters. It was nothing special. In fact it was a bit obvious, just a head divided into four parts. It acted as the open/closed sign on the shop door. Long before Headquarters closed down it had become faded due to the sun, so I retrieved it, stuck it in my portfolio and forgot about it.
Last year I was raking through my things looking for something else when I came across it again. Now, I am in fairly regular touch with Simon who runs the Edinburgh Gig Archive and a few of my pieces of memorabilia and reminiscences are posted on there. Among the sections on the site there is one for record shops and Simon already had an entry for Headquarters, so I scanned the sign and sent it to him and he added it to the site.
There it sat, looking faded and innocuous, with a little acknowledgement with my name under it. Until last Friday, when Simon received an e-mail from someone saying that I hadn’t produced it and wanting my name removed. According to this correspondent, all of the art work for the shop was done by Kenny Skeed and I was obviously trying to steal his glory. (Kenny Skeed was a well known Edinburgh muralist and died in 2008.)
Simon, naturally, got back to me and I re-confirmed that I had done the sign, but as that was all I had done I had no reason to doubt that Kenny Skeed had done the rest of the shop. After all someone had designed the frontage, the bags and advertising and it wasn’t me.
Simon responded to the e-mail accordingly and got a load of abuse back.
Firstly, it’s no skin off my nose to be accused of not being the artist. I know I was. Anyone who knows my style and looks at it would know it was me and not Kenny Skeed. Apart from that it was based on a photograph of a friend of mine and I still have the photograph to prove it. And why, at my age, would I be trying to claim authorship of something which is forty years old and not particularly good in the first place if it wasn’t mine?
No, what concerns me is the belief that people have that the Internet somehow gives them immunity from manners and lets them be as offensive as they like. Both e-mails Simon received were abrupt and gratuitously rude. Even if I had been at fault, he wasn’t, so why attack him in that way, and over something so trivial and inconsequential, and why have a go at someone you don’t know from adam when you know none of the facts about what you are attacking?
Regrettably, this kind of behaviour is all too common in cyberspace, occasionally even in some of the posts on this site.

I have nothing to say and I'm going to say it.