New Portobello High School- Where and how?

by **Dadaist** » 12 Sep 2006, 08:47

I've answered both Bob (with reference to his long-winded rhetorical question) and Porty (with reference to his attack on "integrity") but been deleted.

It's fascinating to watch the amount of scorn being poured onto PPAG by forum members!

by **bbbrown** » 12 Sep 2006, 09:37

who is winning the green arguement?
i know one thing....it aint the the Park.....

by **Dadaist** » 12 Sep 2006, 09:40

I quite liked my answer to Bob's question, but the mods snipped it.

I know what you mean, bb. Looks like we're going to keep losing green space til there isn't any left to sell off.

BUT EDUCATION IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN OXYGEN

This post was moderated Tue 12 Sept 9.48 a.m.

by **Porty** » 12 Sep 2006, 12:22

The council executive offered no objection (not sure if that's the same as unanimous?) to proceeding with consultation on the preferred options put forward in the council report. (However, other options such as St John's @ Powerleague or Scottish Power site) can still be part of the cosultation process.

There were good deputations by the various interest groups, everyone made some valid points.

The meeting was a tough one, particularly the bullying of Roy Jobson by Councillor White.

by **Porty** » 12 Sep 2006, 13:44

by **Bob Jefferson** » 12 Sep 2006, 14:18

by **Dadaist** » 12 Sep 2006, 14:31

by **Bob Jefferson** » 12 Sep 2006, 14:34

Here is the official PFANS position as at 10 am today:

[quote]Portobello High School: Why there can be no further delay

The school environment cannot provide a 21st Century education.

The Council has assessed almost every aspect of the building as â€œpoorâ€

by **Dadaist** » 12 Sep 2006, 14:37

If PPAG are to be consistently whipped over their perceived about face, PFANS should certainly be held to account over their swift initial support of the cooncil plan despite being named otherwise.

by **Porty** » 12 Sep 2006, 14:38

by **Dadaist** » 12 Sep 2006, 14:43

by **bbbrown** » 12 Sep 2006, 14:53

by **Bob Jefferson** » 12 Sep 2006, 15:11

by **Bob Jefferson** » 12 Sep 2006, 19:57

Meanwhile, back on the 'Comments' section of the EN (see link posted previously), the debate continues with Stephen taking on all-comers.

by **Porty** » 12 Sep 2006, 21:18

I don't know if anyone is compiling a summary of the goings on today? Will we get the submissions and the answers to the questions posed by the councillors.

by **Dave Connelly** » 13 Sep 2006, 10:21

by **Dave Connelly** » 13 Sep 2006, 10:26

by **bbbrown** » 13 Sep 2006, 10:40

by **Dave Connelly** » 13 Sep 2006, 10:40

by **Porty** » 13 Sep 2006, 10:41

by **Pal of Porty** » 13 Sep 2006, 11:00

by **Dave Connelly** » 13 Sep 2006, 11:21

by **Dave Connelly** » 13 Sep 2006, 11:22

by **Dave Connelly** » 13 Sep 2006, 11:24

by **Porty** » 13 Sep 2006, 11:25

by **Dave Connelly** » 13 Sep 2006, 11:25

by **Porty** » 13 Sep 2006, 11:28

by **Dave Connelly** » 13 Sep 2006, 11:30

by **Porty** » 13 Sep 2006, 11:51

by **Dave Connelly** » 13 Sep 2006, 12:16

New Portobello High School- Where and how?

censorship again?

Re: schools

censorship

Re: censorship

Re: censorship

Who is online