New Portobello High School- Where and how?

by **Bob Jefferson** » 16 Sep 2006, 13:10

From today's EN Letters Page:

by **Bob Jefferson** » 18 Sep 2006, 12:53

From today's EN Letters Page:

by **Rex_Mundi** » 18 Sep 2006, 18:32

by **Porty** » 19 Sep 2006, 09:13

by **bbbrown** » 19 Sep 2006, 09:21

by **Porty** » 19 Sep 2006, 09:34

by **Alison Connelly** » 19 Sep 2006, 11:03

by **Porty** » 19 Sep 2006, 11:26

by **Maria** » 19 Sep 2006, 13:54

by **Bob Jefferson** » 20 Sep 2006, 12:56

We now have good quality colour drawings of the three possible sites for PHS from the feasbility report:

by **Bob Jefferson** » 20 Sep 2006, 13:00

From today's EN Letters Page:

by **Bob Jefferson** » 20 Sep 2006, 13:15

by **Porty** » 20 Sep 2006, 13:19

by **Pal of Porty** » 20 Sep 2006, 13:33

by **Alison Connelly** » 20 Sep 2006, 13:34

by **Bob Jefferson** » 20 Sep 2006, 13:46

by **Porty** » 20 Sep 2006, 14:01

by **Bob Jefferson** » 20 Sep 2006, 16:31

Completists, and perhaps Seanie, will be pleased to know that I have now added the missing 'Schedules of Accomodation' for PHS and St Johns to the Schools Document Archive.

by **Alison Connelly** » 20 Sep 2006, 18:45

by **Alison Connelly** » 20 Sep 2006, 18:53

by **Bob Jefferson** » 20 Sep 2006, 18:55

Alison, all I can say is that if the decision is to build a school or schools on Portobello Park then I will be happy to campaign with you for funding from the Executive to avoid the need for housing on the Golf Course.

What are you offering in return?

by **Izzie** » 20 Sep 2006, 20:39

by **Porty** » 20 Sep 2006, 22:34

by **Dave Connelly** » 20 Sep 2006, 23:06

by **Rex_Mundi** » 20 Sep 2006, 23:36

by **Bob Jefferson** » 21 Sep 2006, 09:11

The has now been updated and includes updated, downloadable posters and leaflets, sporting the new tagline 'Give a little green'.

by **Bob Jefferson** » 21 Sep 2006, 09:15

Please note that now has all the consultation papers online. Just click on the 'Current Consultations' button.

by **Porty** » 21 Sep 2006, 09:31

by **Dadaist** » 21 Sep 2006, 09:41

Now that both PFANS and PPAG have skipped the odd groove and moved on to track 2 of their respective debut albums, I'm getting a little confused as to their agendas.

I guffawed when I saw the PFANS page - it's still confusingly sporting the demand for an improved golf course - understandable if you've been following this whole thing and know that they came about to cheerlead the initial council plan, but eyebrow-raising given the reverse nature of the now-expanded choices being put out, combined with the fact that issues like housing,funding, St Johns etc seem to all have been teased out into their own issues.

Same deal for PPAG now that they have committed their Figgate boo-boo.

Imagine if international groups had agendas and slogans as confusing, vague and contradictory as this ...

"Save Some Of The Rainforest"

"Abolish Most Nuclear Weapons"

etc

It's almost getting to be like the difference between Neo-Labour and the Tories!

by **Porty** » 21 Sep 2006, 10:04

New Portobello High School- Where and how?

Who is online