by Porty » 06 Feb 2012, 21:01
I was planning on opening with the credibility one!
This is real life.Real people, real PI outcomes, real summation and real reasoning. The only questionmark is over your apparently unreal interpretation.
I say you appear to have neither the evidence or wherewithal to support whatever your understanding is of this matter. I'm not dissing your general, professional expertise.
Not having time or inclination to cut and paste the evidence doesnt help much. So when we next meet, if the lack of substantiation still prevails then I don't see why you would take issue with my assertion.
.....ambition makes you look pretty ugly