Superstore - New Petrol Station - Parking - New Access

by **wangi** » 20 Sep 2004, 17:14

I don't know who's responsible for , but it's pretty stale. Doesn't even list the 04/10 meeting... Or a lot of the other info in this thread.

by **dccairns** » 20 Sep 2004, 20:56

by **dccairns** » 30 Sep 2004, 19:13

by **dccairns** » 02 Oct 2004, 16:58

by **Gemini** » 05 Oct 2004, 06:55

by **Guest** » 05 Oct 2004, 21:31

In case anyone missed this story in today's EN:

by **Guest** » 06 Oct 2004, 20:02

by **Guest** » 06 Oct 2004, 20:33

by **Hawkeye** » 06 Oct 2004, 23:06

A couple of comments on BobÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s highlighted text:

The community, as far as I can tell, is over 90% behind this campaign - the query being raised is how much is our partner, the Council, behind it. Throughout several meetings and discussions over the last couple of weeks PCATS have been encouraged to defend the decision to refuse the superstore application on retail grounds at the forthcoming public inquiry. At no time was any suggestion made that the grounds for refusing on retail would be withdrawn. There was an audible expression of shock from the 150 people at the pre-inquiry meeting on Monday when this was announced and it is important for openness with the community that the committee of PCATS makes their position known.

I do not recognise any party squabbling as the political allegiance of the campaign supporters is unknown to me but is likely to be quite varied. The PCATS committee comprises some individuals from different main political parties but the majority have declared no political leaning. Great effort has been made not to make political capital from this and support has been expressed from Conservatives, Greens, Labour, Liberal Democrats, Scottish Nationalists and the Scottish Socialist Party.

by **Gemini** » 07 Oct 2004, 21:02

by **Guest** » 07 Oct 2004, 21:44

Criticism of Lawrence, Maureen, Trevor Davies and everyone else who is on your side is counter-productive, plays straight into the developers' hands and is, in my opinion, entirely unwarranted.

The Council has chosen to oppose the superstore on the grounds it believes to have the highest chance of success. In any case, I'm not sure that the Council would be allowed to pay for a retail analyst for PCATS, even if it wanted to.

Furthermore, I know that both of our local councillors are totally opposed to the superstore, I do not believe that either is prepared to accept any form of compromise, and I challenge you to produce any evidence to the contrary.

Please sort out your differences in private and let's concentrate on fighting a successful campaign together. Frankly, I am tempted to delete this post, along with the previous four, in the best interests of the campaign. Don't you think the developers monitor this forum?

by **dccairns** » 07 Oct 2004, 22:32

by **Guest** » 07 Oct 2004, 22:37

by **Dadaist** » 15 Oct 2004, 21:55

by **Dadaist** » 15 Oct 2004, 21:57

by **wangi** » 15 Oct 2004, 23:07

by **Dadaist** » 15 Oct 2004, 23:11

by **Porty** » 16 Oct 2004, 10:26

by **Maria** » 16 Oct 2004, 10:35

by **Dadaist** » 16 Oct 2004, 10:40

by **Porty** » 16 Oct 2004, 11:02

by **Porty** » 16 Oct 2004, 11:03

by **Pal of Porty** » 16 Oct 2004, 11:16

by **Maria** » 16 Oct 2004, 12:54

Read an article in the "Evening News" which mentions Lawrence Marshall Looks like he does too much of a good job for his local constituents according to some of his colleagues?

by **Dadaist** » 16 Oct 2004, 23:17

by **bearcub** » 17 Oct 2004, 17:45

by **wangi** » 17 Oct 2004, 21:32

by **Guest** » 26 Oct 2004, 12:03

by **dccairns** » 29 Oct 2004, 14:18

by **dccairns** » 07 Nov 2004, 15:57

by **Guest** » 07 Nov 2004, 16:50

by **ecm** » 07 Nov 2004, 16:59

by **administrator** » 07 Nov 2004, 17:03

by **bearcub** » 07 Nov 2004, 19:18

by **Guest** » 07 Nov 2004, 19:21

Can we please keep the T-shirt discussion to the new thread I started recently, in order to avoid confusion.

Superstore - New Petrol Station - Parking - New Access

PRE-INQUIRY MEETING

PCATS FUNDRAISERS

Who is online