by allaboardtheskylark » 10 Jun 2010, 23:07
As for the PCC. Surely the whole of the communities views should be reflected.
It seemed to be thanks for the meeting but, traffic, open space, loss of amenity blah, blah.
No thanks for a £41.5M investment with a further £0.5M for "loss of amenity". No suggestions as to how this £0.5M could be spent.
Has the PCC been aware of the poor state of the school. Not to mention the discredited design and the potential for long term closures. Has this been reflected in their minutes over the last 10, 20 etc years.....or does the school only get a mention when a hardcore of campaigners want to stop it being relocated. This without any suggestion as to how to resolve the issue.
Who do they really represent!!!!